Module 03 · 12 minutes

Roles

Define roles, team structure, shared services, and how different functions will work together.

Written and edited by Cahyanto Arie Wibowo. Last reviewed · version 1.2.

What does “Roles” mean in practice?

Here, Leadership asks what Roles changes for the person making, reviewing, or living with a decision. Place Roles inside a workflow you already know. Who provides the input, who uses the result, and who needs to review it? You will turn Roles from an abstract idea into a choice with an owner and a review rule.

A visual model for “Roles” in Leadership: relationships matter as much as individual parts.

After this lesson

  • Here, Leadership asks what Roles changes for the person making, reviewing, or living with a decision.
  • Use the idea of “Roles” to interpret one realistic situation.
  • Explain the limits of the concept and the information that still needs to be checked.

Start with the situation

Understand the situation first. The label can come later.

A central team can protect standards while domain teams contribute context they understand directly. This lesson uses the idea of “Roles” to examine that situation without treating a single term as the answer to every problem.

Here, Leadership asks what Roles changes for the person making, reviewing, or living with a decision. Define roles, team structure, shared services, and how different functions will work together. Connect the term to a decision someone genuinely needs to make.

See how the decision unfolds

Move from the situation to a choice others can review.

01

Situation

A central team can protect standards while domain teams contribute context they understand directly. This lesson uses the idea of “Roles” to examine that situation without treating a single term as the answer to every problem.

02

Decision

A central team can protect standards while domain teams contribute context they understand directly. Identify the part of the situation most closely connected to the idea of “Roles”. Use the case as a thinking tool, not as proof that one solution fits every context.

03

Review

A center of excellence without clear authority can become another bottleneck. This mistake often appears when a label is used before the problem is understood. Write down your assumptions so another person can review them.

Do not rush the choice

Two ways to look at Roles

Useful when

  • Here, Leadership asks what Roles changes for the person making, reviewing, or living with a decision.
  • Use the idea of “Roles” to interpret one realistic situation.
  • Here, Leadership asks what Roles changes for the person making, reviewing, or living with a decision. Define roles, team structure, shared services, and how different functions will work together. Connect the term to a decision someone genuinely needs to make.

Pause and check

  • A center of excellence without clear authority can become another bottleneck. This mistake often appears when a label is used before the problem is understood. Write down your assumptions so another person can review them.
  • Explain the limits of the concept and the information that still needs to be checked.

The stronger choice is the one whose evidence, owner, and limits can be explained, not simply the more sophisticated option.

Visual model

Map the parts before choosing what to do.

A visual model for “Roles” in Leadership: relationships matter as much as individual parts.

Read the diagram as a map of Roles: begin with the context, follow the connections, and inspect the highlighted point before making a decision.

Pause for a moment

What evidence could change this decision?

Answer before opening the discussion. Name one fact and one assumption.

Open the discussion

Here, Leadership asks what Roles changes for the person making, reviewing, or living with a decision. Place Roles inside a workflow you already know. Who provides the input, who uses the result, and who needs to review it? You will turn Roles from an abstract idea into a choice with an owner and a review rule.

A tempting shortcut

A familiar term can still lead us to the wrong decision.

Why this can seem reasonable

A center of excellence without clear authority can become another bottleneck. This mistake often appears when a label is used before the problem is understood. Write down your assumptions so another person can review them.

How to check it

Place Roles inside a workflow you already know. Who provides the input, who uses the result, and who needs to review it? Begin with what can be observed, then separate facts, assumptions, and open questions.

Try it on your work

Try it with one small piece of real work.

  1. Choose one real situation related to Roles.
  2. Separate what you can observe from what you are assuming.
  3. Write one decision, its owner, and the evidence needed to review it.
  4. Name the signal that would make you stop or change direction.

Write two examples that fit Roles and one that does not. Explain the difference in your own words. The larger module activity is: Design an AI operating model for one organization. Keep the first version small enough for another person to review in a few minutes.

Quick practice

Write two examples that fit Roles and one that does not. Explain the difference in your own words. The larger module activity is: Design an AI operating model for one organization.

Summary

  • Here, Leadership asks what Roles changes for the person making, reviewing, or living with a decision.
  • Use examples and evidence to test your understanding.
  • Record the limits, risks, and conditions that should trigger another review.

Continue from here

Sources and further reading

  • AI Risk Management Framework Playbook: NIST · official-framework. Primary reference for the definition, evidence, or limits discussed in “Roles”.
  • People + AI Guidebook: Google PAIR · official-guidebook. Further evidence and context for checking the explanation in “Roles”.
  • Rules of Machine Learning: Google for Developers · official-guidance. Further evidence and context for checking the explanation in “Roles”.